+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24
  1. #1
    Full Throttle
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri
    Posts
    667

    Removing the MAF screen: worth it?

    Now that I'm in the middle of modifying my induction, I'm always hearing about small, free mods I can make to the setup.

    One such is the simple removal of the MAF screen. But is this a good thing? Isn't it there to help protect the sensitive sensors inside the MAF housing? I mean I've already got much more air coming in from under the car now with the CAI and the engine is breathing much better thanks to the Whisper lid. So do I really need to risk something flying up inside my engine or hitting the MAF sensors just to gain what is probably an unnoticable amount of power?

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many

  3. #2
    Light Throttle
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Moore, OK
    Posts
    226
    The MAF screen is there to smooth out airflow over the sensor so that it is a uniform, laminar flow over the sensor.

    I have heard that removing it can cause the car to lean out or rough out the idle, but I personally have removed it on 6 cars and have had no ill effects.
    1997 Riviera L67
    2000 Pontiac Montana
    2001 Suzuki SV650S

  4. #3
    i removed mine and all is well. i hear it is a mod for those with straight throttle bodies. and since you have a 99 you should be ok. but keep it just in case you need to reinstall it if your car is adversly affected by the modification.
    2001 Rally Red Camaro 3800 M5
    Go- K&N FIPK, Pacesetter Headers, SLP LM, MSD 8.5mm, Hurst STS
    Show- Xenon Front, 077s, Clears
    NYI- ZT LSD, 3in Catco with SPipe

  5. #4
    Weight Nazi Little G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Ewing, NJ
    Posts
    493
    You'll be fine. You can always put it back in. MAFs are cheap anyway, even if you do break it, which won't cause the car not to run, so it's not like it's an emergency.

    g
    Craig|2002 Pewter V6 Camaro M5
    Fear the Gear. 13.585 @ 100.05 1.827 60'
    No Cam. No Power-adders. No worries.
    Quickest stock-motor N/A 3800II.

    mods: Gear, weight reduction, tuning

    beater: 93 Jeep Grand Cherokee

  6. #5
    detailing nazi 00firebird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Novi, Michigan
    Posts
    7,142
    i wouldnt do it, ive found some nasty things in the airbox that probably would of damaged the engine had i removed the screen

    Phil - 2000 black a4 Firebird
    Lid / K&N / Magnaflow 3'' Cat-back, !Cat, TSP tune
    SLP Bilstein/Eibach suspension 17x9.5 Privat Profils
    Performabuilt Level 2 4l60e / Amsoil ATF / Aluminum DS

  7. #6
    Blueberry Bob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Lynchburg, VA
    Posts
    7,299
    Gamer IDs

    PSN ID: BobsSilverSix
    The screen is not a filter, its there to smooth out the airflow. If you have nasty shit in your air box, it will have no problem going through the screen anyway. Why does everyone think its a filter? Remove it, I did and it didn't hurt shit.
    Bob
    Atlantic Members Moderator




  8. #7
    It moves !!!!
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    St Louis, Mo, only on the IL side
    Posts
    13,705
    Quote Originally Posted by Little G
    You'll be fine. You can always put it back in. MAFs are cheap anyway, even if you do break it, which won't cause the car not to run, so it's not like it's an emergency.

    g
    if $200 is cheap i want your job !!!
    www.turbov6camaro.com
    1997 3800 Series II Camaro
    4600 Stall for my ride to the mall
    7.182@99.57 1/8 -1.8x sixty (current quickest v6 fbod)
    11.23@ unk 1/4 - 7.197 1/8 - 1.83 sixty
    Call me Viper

  9. #8
    Weight Nazi Little G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Ewing, NJ
    Posts
    493
    http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=7988389055

    And I've seen people sell them for a few bucks too.
    Craig|2002 Pewter V6 Camaro M5
    Fear the Gear. 13.585 @ 100.05 1.827 60'
    No Cam. No Power-adders. No worries.
    Quickest stock-motor N/A 3800II.

    mods: Gear, weight reduction, tuning

    beater: 93 Jeep Grand Cherokee

  10. #9
    It moves !!!!
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    St Louis, Mo, only on the IL side
    Posts
    13,705
    Quote Originally Posted by Little G
    http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...tem=7988389055

    And I've seen people sell them for a few bucks too.
    non for 1997

    never mind found one.......

    i can't figure out whats wrong with my car idling high every now and then and it alway fix itself before i can get my scanner on it
    www.turbov6camaro.com
    1997 3800 Series II Camaro
    4600 Stall for my ride to the mall
    7.182@99.57 1/8 -1.8x sixty (current quickest v6 fbod)
    11.23@ unk 1/4 - 7.197 1/8 - 1.83 sixty
    Call me Viper

  11. #10
    It goes up AND down!!!! Malice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Norf Carolana
    Posts
    7,859
    Take the stupid thing out. I've had mine out for 4 years now, and the car runs great.
    2010 Camaro RS/SS LS3 M6 AFe cai, GMPP catback

  12. #11
    Full Throttle
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri
    Posts
    667
    Well what kind of performance do I really get from removing it? That was part of my concern, whether or not it's even worth doing. It can't be a noticeable difference can it?

  13. #12
    It goes up AND down!!!! Malice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Norf Carolana
    Posts
    7,859
    I noticed a big difference. After removing my MAF screen, I crunched it together into a solid wad, and put it back into my TB. It covered up approx one third of the available throttle area.

    Basically, it turns your 65mm throttle into a 44mm throttle. I think 33% more airflow potential would be a step in the right direction.
    2010 Camaro RS/SS LS3 M6 AFe cai, GMPP catback

  14. #13
    I'm goin' nonlinear! GT Jon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    34,874
    Well, unlike Malice I'd probably leave the screen intact in case anything happens. Yes, I'm sure that Malice crushed the screen in the name of science, and was not under the influence of 'Roid Rage when the incident occurred.
    2002 Camaro Z28, M6 | 2005 Pontiac Grand Prix GT (Wife's DD, so sexy...)
    1987 Fiero GT (Project Blog!) | 1998 Platinum Gray Metallic Buick Regal GS

    "He has no enemies, but is intensely disliked by his friends.." - Oscar Wilde

  15. #14
    Full Throttle
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri
    Posts
    667
    So did anyone else who removed it notice this big difference?

  16. #15
    free mods never really give a big difference. Big gains cost a lot of money, but for the whole five mins it took to take it out it was worth it and it is noticable. Not going to make your car fly by any means, but like everyone is saying take it out and see for yourself. If you dont like it put it back in. By having it out for a day i doubt the engine damaging particles that everyone speaks of will make it through your filter.
    2001 Rally Red Camaro 3800 M5
    Go- K&N FIPK, Pacesetter Headers, SLP LM, MSD 8.5mm, Hurst STS
    Show- Xenon Front, 077s, Clears
    NYI- ZT LSD, 3in Catco with SPipe

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts